16 Nov
2013
16 Nov
'13
2:43 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013, at 06:57 PM, Privarchy Mee wrote:
The claim is that Judge Loretta A. Preska, who sentenced Jeremy Hammond today, said that for the three years (post-release) that he was to spend under supervision, he will not be able to use encryption for communication or storage purposes(!) which is practically a legal edict to go and build a cabin by Walden Pond. How can this be considered anything but cruel and unusual?
Simple explanation: Idiot judge who simply does not understand technology and just wants good PR for the court. This is simply unconscionable and unenforceable and will probably be at least accidentally disobeyed at least once without the court's knowledge. -- Shawn K. Quinn skquinn@rushpost.com