On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 20:25:39 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:

>  On Tuesday, November 12, 2019, 11:51:44 AM PST, Ryan Carboni <ryacko@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  >Bolivia coup led by Christian fascist paramilitary leader and
> millionaire – with foreign support
> https://thegrayzone.com/2019/11/11/bolivia-coup-fascist-foreign-support-fernando-camacho/
>
>> >Read it in full, it will get to the part about Americans.
>
>> Perhaps, but it sure sounds like Evo Morales engaged in a 'slow-motion-coup', trying to get the public to agree to elimination of the term-limits law, and when that failed, get his cronies in the Supreme Court to okay that anyway.  Are people in Bolivia not allowed to object to that manipulation and corruption?  Can they not act to take that fraudster out of office, lest it be labelled a "coup"?


  >  so are you siding with the pro amerikkka fascists in bolivia? 

You are strongly implying:

1.  There are only two 'sides'.

2.  And that if you are 'against' Morales, you must be 'for those "pro amerikka fascists in bolivia"'.

I don't know any such thing.  I am quite capable of being against Morales, without necessarily agreeing with all others who also oppose him, and especially for all their reasons.  

 >   morales was far from ideal but he did some things that no 'libertarian' in the american cesspool would ever dare to do 

We don't yet know who his replacement will be, or his policies.  


    Bolivian President Evo Morales Declares Israel A 'Terrorist State,' Renounces Treaty

 >   oh and what about at least partially telling the DEA to fuck off? 

That sounded like an excellent aspect to Morales' policy.  I hope the next guy maintains this policy.


>    "Bolivia's Morales boosts legal coca production "
    Bolivia's Morales boosts coca production

If it were me making the decision, I would not merely "boost" cocaine production, I would make it entirely legal, with no limits whatsoever.  (I would not, of course, make it MANDATORY.)

                Jim Bell