13 Dec
2016
13 Dec
'16
10:19 p.m.
On 12/13/2016 04:06 PM, John Newman wrote:
Also, please don't pretend I'm arguing for moderation on cypherpunks - I'm not, I never have, and I think it's an awful fit for this list.
What is your alternative proposal for cleaning up the list and ensuring its continued existence? If you have a way to rid of all the e-turds being sent to this list without moderation, I'm all ears. However, at the current rate, in a couple of months "moderator(s)" wouldn't be an accurate description of those with the responsibility--it would be more like "zookeeper(s)." -- Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn@rushpost.com> http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com