All your contributions are freedom-destroying.
I remember my early cp days and wondering how "commercial enterprise" would work in an actually libertarian or anarchistic community. Folks round here pointed me to various readings to understand certain concepts I was missing, and I peeked at Bakunin and Bobbio for starters, and others, and more are on my bucket list. One 'ahah' moment came from my question that when we have no coercive government wielding exclusive or predominant right and use of force over the individual humans in a community, what are we left with (wrt commercial interactions between humans)? And at least one answer is "private contract". At a fundamental level, exercising coercive force over humans who have given no consent to such use, and have not otherwise agreed to any particular law or contract, is a fundamental wrong, a violation of the inherent dignity of that individual and a violation of that individual's sovereign right to choose who to interact with or engage with (either commercially or in any other way). Violate such fundamental sovereignty (with laws, "government's "right" to exclusive use of force on a day to day basis", etc etc), and we have taken away or given up freedom at a very basic level, and as a result, created a nation of human slaves - those who are compliant and usually angry at the fundamental violation of their dignity. We must respect the right of every human to conscientiously object to those laws he deems "an ass of a law", in all cases where that human harms no one. To have an ethical law of contract? We have to say that, at least at a certain "coming of age", an individual human ought be bound by his explicit agreements, and to some degree (open to debate), his tacit agreements (those things he has not explicitly objected to). But to deny the right to conscientiously object, or to peacefully protest, is nothing but a raw tyranny upon those who seek a better world.