On 09/08/2016 09:12 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 08:58:16PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
On 09/08/2016 08:50 PM, Cypher Piggie wrote:
todefend to SOMEONE ELSE'S death his right to say it. Â <vbg>Â Â Â Â
juan has no right abuse others....
He for sure does! But maybe not so repetitiously, like a fucking bot ;)
This is the cotton wool generation, where "I have the right to a pristine auditory/ visual environment, where my ears and eyes cannot be assaulted by words which offend me", and if the word you use does offend me, I have a right to bring criminal charges against you.
The "cotton wool generation"? I just tell trolls to fuck off :)
Safe spaces, anti-vilification, right to be not offended, right to stop others from speaking their mind.
Abuses of the lanugage used to abuse perceived abusers of language.
Whatever, Zenaan. I also have the right to ignore and slander him ;)
And here's another such abuse:
Which also has no conceivable relationship to cypherpunk :)
RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOUR BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOUR OR NATIONAL OR ETHNIC ORIGIN
Note the word "behaviour", when the section then defines behaviour as: "causes words, sounds, images or writing to be communicated to the public"
which is actually speech, not behaviour. The usual abuse of language by those who wish to impose their views on the rest of the world.