On 05/15/2016 02:53 PM, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2016 02:02:26 -0300
juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, isn't that as bloated as firefox...? Even worse
> since it also has mail, irc, an html editor(...) etc.
[drwho@windbringer ~]$ cd /usr/bin/
[drwho@windbringer bin]$ ls -alF firefox seamonkey
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jan 6 20:35 firefox ->
/usr/lib/firefox/firefox*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Dec 6 16:12 seamonkey
-> /usr/lib/seamonkey-2.39/seamonkey*
[drwho@windbringer bin]$ ls -alF /usr/lib/firefox/firefox
/usr/lib/seamonkey-2.39/seamonkey
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 150720 Jan 6 20:35
/usr/lib/firefox/firefox*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 121848 Dec 6 16:12
/usr/lib/seamonkey-2.39/seamonkey*
Oh, and just for fun, here's Palemoon's
(https://www.palemoon.org/) disk
footprint:
[drwho@windbringer bin]$ ls -alF /usr/lib/palemoon/palemoon
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 240720 Apr 30 21:18
/usr/lib/palemoon/palemoon*
>
Pale moon worked well for me using Windoze, which it's optimized
for. It's memory control did not seem to be as good with the
Mint/Lubuntu distro I installed on that same machine. HOWEVER at the
time I was using an older single core machine that the later V of
Palemoon didn't work with because of a chipset instruction not
available in the Turlon64 chip. I never did try it with a later CPU
and a recent Palemoon release..