Martial Law test run

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 23:48:02 +1100 Zenaan Harkness wrote:

On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 07:14:54AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:

...

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:03:49 +1100 Zenaan Harkness wrote:

...

By all means feel free to continue to abide immoral, unjust, unconstitutional and downright evil man made laws.

and you of course and yet another infinite clown. A trumpofascist calling for military dictatorship.

For a geographically limited, restricted purpose, time limited, morally righteous, benevolent military dictatorship, in the USA, yes. And I shall continue to so advocate to the extent it seems wise/ apropos to circumstances.

you can 'clarify' all you want and I'd ocassionally comment that you advocate military dictatorship and that's impossible for your position to be more opposed to whatever 'libertarian' 'principles', 'cypherpunks' pretend to favor. also, I got a new word : cypherfascist.

(Quite analogous to Crimea's secession/re-unification referendum.)

Context is of course everything, as you've been reminding us well ("conflict may arise when the righteous man defends himself" - you've shared other such fundamental, and fundamentally good, principles).

By the way, thank you for having such temperance and patience to ask me that graceful question - others may also have misunderstood my earlier words without that explanation re "context" ;)

lawl, as if 'context' was hidden in any way. We all know what is posted to the list and there is a public archive.