On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Bear <bear@sonic.net> wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 10:23 -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
> So the reporter found someone who might be the inventor of bitcoin, or might be a little crazy and just saying so, or might be sick of weirdos "tracking him down" because of his name and just be saying what he thinks will get the reporter to go away.  From what is in the article, how would we distinguish these possibilities?
>
> --John

And let's not forget the possibility, that when he said
"I no longer have anything to do with that and I can't
talk about it," he might have been talking about his prior
work for the US gummint, and the reporter simply quoted
him with an implication that he was talking about Bitcoin.

"Can't talk about it" is some pretty specific language, I
think.  It sounds to me like an NDA, not a project now being
carried on by others.

I'd never have believed how much reporters misquote folks
or misapply the quotes they reproduce correctly, until I
actually got some first-hand experience with it.


and he says something in the ap interview about that bitcoin was developed in 2001 - when i think the whitepaper was presented in 2008 - he says he was working on developing something else at that time 

i think you are right - i know from dealing with ppl who have signed agreements re classified info that they can be kinda obsessed with that - he may have been referencing that instead 

journalist can be totally fraudulent for sure but others in the article seemed to blab a lot - people are strange theres like a switch that gets turned on when they talk to interviewers a ´stupid switch´
 

_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography



--
Cari Machet
NYC 646-436-7795
carimachet@gmail.com
AIM carismachet
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Berlin +49 152 11779219
Reykjavik +354 894 8650
Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>

7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187

Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
permission is strictly prohibited.