-----Original Message----- From: cypherpunks [mailto:cypherpunks-bounces@lists.cpunks.org] On Behalf Of Zig the N.g Sent: Sunday, 26 April, 2020 12:40 AM To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org Subject: JewTube's CEO Wojcicki: "anything that would go against World Health Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy" - [PEACE] and [HEALTH]
Harr de harr harr, stright from The Ministry's Department Of Our Forever Bracked Overlords - JewTube be keepin dey information LameStream:
Jewess Who Runs JewTube Vows to Censor Anything That Contradicts Doctor WHO http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/jewess-who-runs-jewtube-vows-to-censor-anythin...
[snip] > https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/youtube-ceo-well-delete-anything-that-cont... > Susan Wojcicki, the CEO of YouTube, announced that all content contradicting the Word Health Organization (WHO) on the coronavirus pandemic will be removed from the video platform. > During a CNN interview last Sunday, Wojcicki explained there was “a 75 percent increase in the news coming from authoritative sources since the beginning of 2020. So, we have seen a lot of demand there.” > “But then we also talk about removing information that is problematic,” she continued. “Of course, anything that is medically unsubstantiated. So people saying, like, take vitamin C, you know, take turmeric, like, those are — will cure you. Those are the examples of things that would be a violation of our policy.” > She then specified that “[a]nything that would go against World Health Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy. And so remove is another really important part of our policy.” [snip] Zenaan, while I don't appreciate all the Daily Stormer links that you're always leaving here, you managed to make me upset with this story. I was on YouTube a lot during its early years (i.e. the 2000s), and it was like a beacon of freedom when compared to how it is now. I always think that the rampant censorship on the site cannot get any worse, now that things as commonplace as "insulting language" are against the site's rules, but every now and then (like today, with this article) I hear news of yet another way that censorship on YouTube has increased. Apologies for rambling; I just have some very fond memories of the old, free YouTube, and it troubles me greatly whenever I learn that free speech on the site has been restricted yet again. (I don't care what Twitter, Facebook, and every other social media site does, but, please, leave YouTube be...)