On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:46:48 +1000 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:51:03PM -0700, Spencer wrote:
Hi,
jim bell: the lack of improvements over time
This seems to stem more from a misplaced understanding of what design is, on the developers side, since non-protocol improvements get ignored, too.
They have explicitly stated that certain features, including chaff fill packets at the protocol layer, have been not granted funding.
Actually what I think I got from scumbag supreme syverson is that any improvements that can affect the alleged 'low latency' of the network gets ignored because 'low latency' is the only thing he cares about. Too bad I didn't get to point out that the reason they want low latency is to be able to control drones...The kind of drones syverson and his supporters use to murder brown children for fun. Anyway, the fact that the 'hacker' and/or 'cypherpunk' 'communities' are almost fully coopted by the US government is the first problem that should be addressed, before bothering with any technicalities. We are still wating for troll rysiek to comment on the current tor developments...unsurprinsigly.
I have suggested a failure to "tweak" their grant proposals/ begging, but in that case when the tweak was discovered by the funders, bad faith would have been shown to the superiors.
Witness also the subtly extreme rebukes against anyone who suggests using bittorrent over Tor - not by the head honcho email addys, but such suggestions consistently draw out a spitting snake in response.
Everyone is of course free to draw conclusions assuming good faith by all players to the greatest extent delusionable.
lolol =)