Andy Isaacson wrote:
I'd be surprised if [ecryptfs] doesn't have critical implementation bugs in the parts that aren't broken by design.
Please don't use ecryptfs. It's not even better than nothing.
BRB, wiping my hard drive for totally unrelated reasons!* ;-) If I remember correctly, ecryptfs was the default home directory encryption option for Ubuntu until recently. Why is it that these things that thousands of people rely on are not audited in any real way? I've used truecrypt with reservations and never in a serious situation. But lots of people are relying on this to keep their data safe while crossing borders, documenting human rights abuses, etc. A company like Canonical should insist on audits before making *anything* the default encryption scheme. These things tend to start as small projects and come to be ubiquitous without most users caring about audits (or being open-source). We need to have higher standards. ~Griffin * It's a joke because I use Debian... now......