On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 09:21:59PM +0000, jim bell wrote:
From: Razer <g2s@riseup.net>
On 02/05/2017 12:07 PM, jim bell wrote:
I think Razer, who was completely unwilling to define the difference between a mere conservative, and a "fascist", is displaying the same kind of obscure inconsistency in meaning. Jim Bell
Whatever jackass. While the left or so-called left debates the ethics of Nazi punching the Right is cheering the potential legalization of killing protesters who block roads. GO FUCK YOURSELF. You're just more proof to the world Libertarians are fascists.
I'll write this down ONE MORE TIME DUPLICATING THE RECORD because you're too fucking STUPID to look it up;
Fascism cannot be conservative, using "American Tradition" as a benchmark, because conservatives understand that some things, such as the internet, did not exist at the time the US founders wrote the constitution and they MAKE ALLOWANCE FOR MODERNIZATION in the documents and laws regarding it.
First, I did a search of my mailbox for "Fascism cannot be conservative", which presumably would find any prior CP comments that you made containing this. I found nothing. I then did a search for "Fascism cannot", and I still found nothing. You claim you are "duplicating the record". I don't see that.
Indubitably nonduplicability alert. (Aka, bong alert.)