On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:57:35PM -0300, Punk - Stasi 2.0 wrote:
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 13:07:13 +1100 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 01:44:38AM +0000, jim bell wrote:
On Thursday, October 31, 2019, 03:47:24 PM PDT, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:47:30PM -0300, Juan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 22:35:47 +1000 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:47:08AM -0600, Mirimir wrote: How about we implement a working AP system? As I said in a previous thread, I now believe that to be fundamentally flawed - that it will not achieve anything resembling justice, even in the long term.
The idea of finishing off criminals like cops, soldiers, politicians, corporatist 'business' men, etc is pretty sound.
The problem is of course how to implement it. If AP can be turned against honest people then it's obviously not a good implementation.
And I can conceive of no possible AP system "which cannot be turned against honest people".
OK. I take back what I said. If AP can be used against honest people, so what. I mean, if it allows us to kill soldiers, cops, wall street bankers and similar animals, then it is a good system.
The balance is of course whom (which class of users) gets to "use it more" against the other class(es). AP is presupposed on an anonymous money betting ring - i.e. on money, which is collected by people who climb the hiearchy of the day, therefore they have more of it. Many orders of magnitude more of it. In facto, the Fed seized the power to print money at its sole discretion, and does so to this day with QE-1, QE-2, QE-3 and now QE-notQE. Hundreds of trillions of fiats, Trillians per year now being "printed" in digital debt increment accounts on Federal reserve computers. What's a few extra billions in the mix? Absolutely a drop in the ocean, to tptb! And, any functional AP market will mean multiple competing markets, multiple competing assassins, and therefore the lowest conceivable prices for the assassinations, therefore chump change for the powers that be. What I don't understand, is why this fundamental fiat dynamic, so utterly stacked against us (and upon which (at least today) any functioning AP must be built) is not utterly and irredeemably stacked against us dissidents? Remember the marginal dissident. Even today, without AP, there are woefully few of us. You might be willing to be a dissident in an AP world ... many would not even try.
ps: oh yes, 'chaos' is (way) better than the current dictatorship. Not to mention, the current system, if not stopped, is going to get a lot worse. So yeah, we need chaos ASAP.
What we need is folks in numbers speaking truth. Statute law is used to make much normal human behaviour illegal and thereby makes criminals of most humans, and exposes those who would otherwise walk with good intention up the hierarchy, to blackmail.