On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 11:20:13PM -0000, Core Samples wrote:
The case of 97% of climate scientists agreeing that human beings are the main cause of warming.
One of the main papers behind the 97 percent claim is authored by John Cook:
Quantifying the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming in the Scientific Literature http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024/pdf
And more - the lies keep coming (getting exposed thankfully): http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-m... " The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. ... But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data. It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised. His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper. "