5 May
2015
5 May
'15
4:22 a.m.
On Mon, 04 May 2015 12:25:34 -0700, Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
I find this unbelievable.
Are you saying the alleged facts you listed are not true? (that's a possibility)
They're true to the best extent that I've been able to determine. If some can identify errors please make them known so the timeline can be corrected.
But if you assmue all that is true, then my view fits nicely. He didn't bothered with 'opsec' because he didn't need to.
That's exactly what I'm driving at. It's hard not to consider the conclusion based on the facts presented in the timeline.