Sure, why not? Why not, you ask. Well, because encryption creates secretkeepers just like official secretkeepers, and it can become an obessession to believe only other secretkeepers and disbelieve those who do not keep secrets. From that a hatred of all-too-trusting openness becomes even more of an enemy. Then the enemy must be demonized and warred against, in secret. However, so long as un-official secretkeeping never turns into protection an uncontrollable killing machine of those who find secretkeeping abysmally opposed to democracy, then it should be an enjoyable past time for innocents avoiding their future of really bad shit planned in official secrecy protected by encryption for their use as cannon fodder. Just a reminder that encryption is a munitions whose only purpose is to secretly fuck with others. Use it for a game only. Wargamers use it to deceive their murderous intentions. Now cryptoanarchy was always only a game of planning assassination of political secretkeepers, despite official misunderstanding and jailing of Jim Bell and Carl Johnson. And not a few others comically believed that encryption would protect them against really dirty fighters who ignored digital black magic to target signal-emitting OTR chatting warriors yarping strategy on cryptophones. My PGP protects my right to post this rant, right? What, there's a fault in my implementation, you say? Sysadmin of mails lists are official informants, come on, now, that's tinfoil gaming.