On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:00:29 -0400 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 06/07/2016 03:13 PM, juan wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 14:59:26 -0400 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
TOR is a two edged sword that can also be used against the National Interest, so the NSA thinks TOR stinks.
False, please do not post garbage. By now any 'observer' should realize that the nsa is a 'fully capable' 'global passive adversary' - In no way tor can be used against the **US** national interest.
HELL, even tor scumbags admit it
http://www.nrl.navy.mil/itd/chacs/biblio/users-get-routed-traffic-corr elation-tor-realistic-adversaries
Do your fucking homework Steve.
Garbage, please do not post "False."
Take it up with fucking syverson steve. It's quite interesting that the highest capo mafioso from tor admits it doesn't work and yet you deny it.
TOR can be used effectively as a component in tactical security protocols, because TOR can prevent identification of users who do brief hit-and-run network access via physical routers not associated with the users in question.
like any cheap VPN or proxy cnt.
And of course, TOR can be up to 100% effective against adversaries who are /not/ top tier signals intelligence services.
Which is not the point, motherfucker.
:o)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXVyfdAAoJEECU6c5XzmuqpCcH/RMepc8NDnZvDSnd2Q05eK67 orX2TIlhE3Ee4XHR03Dqm7jmltWok7JkHkBT6BHTuFLuW2p3AGyxp7aDqCZYjeTA YtowxSR8uOirsAqvAt3FmHln9kvdhsagu3Chsubp3jaMx+vymoPtGOUqBwvgdVMP WNcGREwX6Za8/PJ4gfp/fWXpgaOwsFoRGaU6qvYmemtzug2kxuPrbn+7XcPKgJAg rwIkjbnd0kjYp8UUazLnSu7cIlM+HL89qEE/0fi+SWz6vQ8YyQXW3sDffZ15Nt5p u79cHC/cRdQpMWdvTjvVs7ALPtvCSpBMdOcy3vbNiclKa9RSUVcfEI6tyrGZitY= =3uG5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----