Technically speaking, all an officer needs is his elected official taking responsibility and backing him/her to do something. The court is over-stepping its jurisdiction and intruding into the executive branch. What needs to happen in cases like these, is that a charge must be brought by a citizen against the police (if operating personally) or the city (if acting officially; i.e. by directives of the elected official) and THEN heard in the Courtroom, so that both parties must testify and conclusions can be drawn. Without a charge where two parties can bring out all of the issues, the court has no real competency or authority to say what the executive can and cannot do. Anyone else question what "circuit court" really means, in relation to the Constitution? Are circuit judges APPOINTED by circuit city? Marxos, JD On 11/16/17, jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
Judge rules NYPD needed a warrant before using cell-site simulator https://www.yahoo.com/newsroom/vibes/news/v-dd323ebb-416a-3b40-b6ef-7e9c677f...