I do agree with steve that the use of the word fuck is a exploitation or degradation of sex/love which is not that great
We need new words
There have been psyche tests on using swear words ... that is benificial to the psyche as a sort of release ... some fri3nds of mine that are autistic find using them to be really helpful but which words using is important
I have 2 friends that had a giant fight about this very thing - one woman was dutch one american - the dutch hated that the new yorker said fuck and the new yorker hated and argued against the dutch woman using the word cunt - which is very common in dutch culture - the giant fight was the demise of their friendship
The dutch stated using fuck was degrading to love
The new yorker stated using cunt was degrading to women
The dutch said degrading love was far worse than degrading women
<3
On 10/25/15, Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/25/2015 12:21 PM, Razer wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/25/2015 08:58 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
>>> On 10/25/2015 11:32 AM, Razer wrote:
>>>> There were no "Purges" in Vietnam.
>>>
>>> IIRC there were, though of course not on a scale to rival Pol
>>> Pot & Co. However, that's beside the point: I was talking
>>> about Amerikan politics, not Asian history.
>>>
>>> :o)
>>>
>>
>> I'm SURE the citizens of Vietnam took good care of their
>> traitors... To the best of my knowledge there were never any
>> government organized purges. What angry citizens might have
>> done to Special Forces installed "Provincial Governments" and
>> errant unfortunate ARVN soldiers does NOT qualify as a purge.
>> What Amerika did to it's labor unionists in the early 1900s
>> does though. America's politics DEPEND on the belief in
>> "Righteous wars" and I'm here to say The US has NEVER fought
>> one. It's a myth.
>
> War is public murder for private profit. I don't know of any
> counter-examples. Again we are up against a collective psychosis,
> normalized by a long history of public acceptance and elaborate
> rationalizations. Sometimes one sees Bad Guys vs. Worse Guys, but
> whenever it's Guys vs. Guys the best that can be accomplished is
> some amount of damage control. Everyone who takes up arms to
> settle the disputes of their rulers and de facto owners is a
> traitor to the human race as a whole.
The challenge is how to spread such a meme effectively, powerfully.
Then perhaps there'd be a hope that people would take up arms against
their owners, or at least in defence of their families (I've posted
the post Hurricane Katrina illegal weapons confiscations by federal
military - no one, NO ONE failed to give up their arms (although TBH I
cannot of course speak to those who denied they had any guns in their
respective home - would love to see some true stories of humans with
spines, balls and ovaries!))
And since Credit River Decision, no judge will take up a ruling
against the banks.
And since the machine gun slaughter of the early unionists, as you
hint at above, all unions have fallen to infiltration/ corruption in
relatively short order.
FUCK it's a fucked up world! Juan, PLEASE tell me there's a better one
somewhere, somehow?
> The "fog of war" has another name, propaganda, and all sides of
> every armed conflict write press releases to establish that their
> only motive is "necessary self defence," or the currently popular
> "responsibility to protect others." The other side of every armed
> conflict always started it, and the regular folks on the other
> side of that border deserve whatever happens to them because they
> failed to stop it.
>
> Too much factual information about war results in large numbers of
> people banding together to have a go at kicking the war machine to
> pieces. So never mind that "ain't gonna study war no more" crap;
> study the fuck out of war and encourage others to do likewise.
ACK! Fuck the fucken war cause that fucken fucker's a fucking fucked
up death fest of evil.
Z