On 2014-01-21 21:45, rysiek wrote:
Dnia poniedziaĆek, 20 stycznia 2014 05:10:58 J.A. Terranson pisze:
The problem I think you are looking to "solve" is *Corporate* anonymity/pseudonymity. Won't happen under todays paradigm: the *fix* is to go back to separation of "natural persons" and "Corporate/chartered persons". The two types of personhood were never designed to be ewuals, yet her we are. :-(
Pretty much this. We need to dismantle the modern-day nobility: http://rys.io/en/77
Corporations are "people" with their "free speech": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission
...trying to have their "privacy": http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/01/us-att-privacy-idUSTRE7203UN201103...
Corporations are people. If you grant lesser rights to corporations than to natural people, then the state can, and will, make corporations fire anyone suspected of thinking politically incorrect thoughts. Turned on the news last night, they were interviewing some silicon valley people, and the interviewer asked about how corporations viewed this and that. One of the interviewees replied "I am a corporation". He complained that he was subject to secret orders by a secret court, which lawless orders he could not tell anyone about, that he himself was being spied upon, that as well as being required to turn over information officially, his information was being stolen unofficially, and that foreign customers had (correctly) come to distrust him. A corporation is freedom of association, a group of people that agree together to act as one. In order to act as one, they delegate complete power over the collective assets of the project to one of themselves, the CEO, who is, often one of the major shareholders. Thus a corporation is people, people agreeing to associate, and corporation is a person, in that the people agreeing to associate commonly nominate one of themselves to be that person.