First, I am not aware that the CP list has ever been limited solely to something that can be strictly labelled as "cryptography".

Second: Fortunately, I just uploaded an item about Lavabit and its operator Levison. Those of us who are truly interested in security (as opposed to those who merely pretend to be, and are actually shills of government) understand that his crypto strength is rather pointless if the operator of a trusted service can be strong-armed by a government. What I've just invented is a method to make it about 18 times harder for the government to threaten somebody with prosecution for anything he might choose to do. (Conviction rate going from 70,000 to 4,000 per year.) But that should have been obvious to anybody. Why wasn't it obvious to you?

Jim Bell

From: Al Billings <albill@openbuddha.com>
To: "cypherpunks@cpunks.org" <cypherpunks@cpunks.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: Injustice: Denial of Disservice Attack

>What does this have to do with cryptography?

>Al Billings

http://makehacklearn.org

On Wednesday, October 2, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Jim Bell wrote:

"INJUSTICE: DENIAL of DISSERVICE ATTACK"

or, "How to really mess up the opponent, and to do so legally" By Jim Bell, Author of 'Assassination Politics'.