On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 03:21:08 -0500 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
low-latency
This phrase is misused by many as if it were some kind of litmus test for determining TA resistance... it is not.
by 'low latency' they mean two things : 1) 'efficient' use of data transmission capacity, i.e. whether chaff is sent(expensive) or not. 2) actual low latency. In order to prevent timing attacks, packets need to be reclocked, which means adding delay, which results in higher 'latency'. So anyway, 'low latency' is shorthand for systems that don't do any of the above, and oo are...shit. And tor is included in the shit cateory. And scum-master syverson openly acknowledges it...in papers that no-one reads, while advertising tor as a means to "Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis." which is of course outright criminal fraud.