[appropriate joke]
PGP seems pretty suspicious, too, no? Also POSIX?
[/appropriate joke]
I don't know why I'm receiving expression from you guys of such poor information.
What can this cypherpunks list do for either you, or your mitm if that is the reason for the poor information?
So, the reason I responded this way was because the information didn't show anything suspicious to me. The reasons for suspicion were a press release that wasn't included, and various behaviors that seem tiny to me.
Meanwhile a lot of people's personally identifying information was being shared, when these people were running, using, and advocating an open source encrypted network . Most of the documents are sharing personal details on the people found related to the network. This can get people very hurt in my opinion; but I infer it is just there so that other people can continue the work and figure out what is real.
It seems to hard to figure out if that press release is real unless the dev says it is.