On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I do see problems with scaling DYI chip projects up to commercial
production numbers, and down in scale to achieve fast, high
capacity performance.  That's why I am much more interested in the
prospects of a manufacturing process built for radical
transparency, using "commercial best practice" technology at
conventional production facilities.

IMO the same kind of radical transparency should apply to all
industrial processes that pose large potential hazards to public
health & safety, i.e. nuclear power stations, transgenic
agriculture, etc.

:o)

 

i have been thinking about this and i was thinking a lot about actual nuclear bomb sites being added to the list 

of 'hazard to public' and i was like - not possible to give the public any kind of access to such horrors but then

its already in play ... NATOish people sold the design of the bomb to pakistan and israel long ago so maybe

actually if more people were involved in the process it would be in safer hands and there would be less

proliferation as it seems to be the modus operandi that there be more bombs to counter

best film ever points in the direction of nano/bio tech possibilities le jette with the murder of species... can we have the components make themselves and self destruct when in danger?   

--

Cari Machet
NYC 646-436-7795
carimachet@gmail.com
AIM carismachet
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Berlin +49 152 11779219
Reykjavik +354 894 8650
Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>

7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187

Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
permission is strictly prohibited.