On Jan 9, 2017, at 4:57 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 07:40:12 +1000 "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:38:54 -0800 Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
The footage speaks for itself.
On 1/9/2017 8:44 AM, juan wrote: Indeed. It clearly shows a building falling on its footprint
Liar
...is what you are =)
As to the rest of your message, I already addressed the point two times. But I'll do it again...
Because WTC 7 was falling sideways before it fell downwards, it did not fall on its own footprint.
The building was falling apart, piece by piece, in an irregular and uneven fashion, until it finally collapsed downwards all at once
First the fuel tank fell down demolishing much of the building's interior.
Oh really? The fuel tank "demolished the building"? Perhaps it had some help from giant mutant rats that crawled out of manhattan mud?
Anyway, the collapse of the roof is indeed, again, mostly symmetrical. You can clearly see a dent in the MIDDLE of the roof. Which happens to be another characteristical feature of CD.
Then a while after that, quite a while after that, the roof buckles. With the roof losing rigidity, there is nothing to stop the building from leaning to one side.
Indeed BOTH (shorter) sides of the building lean INWARDS A FEW DEGREES, and that's what controlled demolition is all about.
Aa I already mentioned 2 times, and I'll mention again, WTC7 is an especially clean example of controlled demolition.
Compare to other buildings blown up here and report back.
staring at 13:20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQgVCj7q49o
It proceeds to lean to one side, very slowly at first, then faster and faster, like a tree falling over, then collapses downwards all at once, no longer like a tree but like a building.
Yes, the final fall, collapsing downwards all at once is just like a controlled demolition -
And so is the onset of the collapse. Also, it is painfully obvious that tens of thousands of tons of steel and the rest of the building can't fall at free fall speed unless columns are cut AT REGULAR INTERVALS.
but the half hour leading up to that was things falling apart in a way totally unlike controlled demolition, and the few seconds leading up to collapsing downwards all at once was the building falling to one side, the complete opposite of a symmetric collapse.
Fucking hilarious watching faux-engineers argue about the pedantic details of shit they don't understand in the advance of a conspiracy theory that is such a dramatic over explanation of what really happened, it's just fucking absurd... I watched the second plane fly into the tower live on television. US foreign policy came home to roost. You don't need to be a "truther" to make the US the bad guy. But, i should expect such theories from people who think anthropic climate change is a hoax. Which, hilariously, is now the CONSENSUS view of the US republican government :)