1st off if someone is indigenous it is not the same as being native polish > mayb u r ignorant of indigenous information AND if an indigenous person wants to talk about it 2 times on a list i think that is interesting not something to censor > i am not interested in censoring or being censored that is one reason i am interested in opensource and you would think that if someone is interested in opensource they would b able to see how that is applicable beyond that of software and the ramifications therein otherwise i really dont need a daddy but thanks anyway - i find your comments incredibly rude and purposefully degrading and quite the contrary to your last sentence which calls for discussion > i dont think you are modeling any kind of way to be open to discussing at all as for your argument re the road i think it would not hold up in court as the road builder would never be held responsible > so in the US the state certifies roads afterwords so the state agency in the US anyway would be liable so... attacking someones form in an argument is really easy and doesnt show an expansive form from the attacker it just shows they lack a formidable argument and hence they loose credibliity and dont engage ethics which is really sad On 1/9/14, rysiek <rysiek@hackerspace.pl> wrote:
Dnia czwartek, 9 stycznia 2014 00:23:50 Cari Machet pisze:
ok mayb i was a little over zealous > i am native american prone to being close to life >
Why do you keep bringing your native-americanness in every otehr post is beyond me. I'm a native Pole, somebody here is probably a native German, what does it have to do with anything? Just drop it already.
so if i build a road and you have a car wreck on it shld i b liable if you kill someone with your car ????
It would also be beneficial to all parties involved if you read the e-mails
you're (supposedly) answering to, and tried to choose analogies accordingly.
But answering your question: if there is a demonstrable fault in the way the
road was built -- for example, there is an *outward* slant at a turn on a highway/motorway -- then I would say "to some extent, yes". To what extent?
That's for the jury to decide, but if the fault contributed to the tragedy,
the builder of the road is (partially) responsible.
By the way, I would greatly appreciate you making the effort to respect the
by-laws of the (let's call that) Internet-natives of this list, and using English instead of the t33nz lulzspk tht u seem 2 b usng, kthx. If you want to encrypt your messages, use PGP instead of lulzspeak, it will work much better.
plus it opens the door for other opensource 'heretical' laws to be promulgated on the citizenry for its 'protection'
That's my problem with this idea, that's why I am floating it and asking for a discussion. Maybe there is a way to do it properly?
-- Pozdr rysiek
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.