20 Aug
2016
20 Aug
'16
6:40 a.m.
On 08/20/2016 12:04 AM, Александр wrote:
Great news.
For those who have suggested it there's already plans and a roadmap for the
fork of Tor. Two concurrent networks which are compatible with a singular browser would greatly diversify the ecosystem and give users more choice. At this point this is the only way forward imo. More info: https://rotorbrowser.com
I don't see the point. As Juan so likes to remind us, Tor design is fundamentally flawed, in that it's vulnerable to global adversaries. Which, in practice, means US military. So how would a fork not be vulnerable as well? Instead, why not develop something better?