--- continued... ---

so maybe nothing is this simple, the previous statements and hypothesis themselves by default ungrounded, unrelated to the complexity involved in the existing context for social relations.

what if the control of 'sexual code' and its programming via advertisement and industries is what formats consciousness and social relations and thus establishes the false 'common value' which is based on pseudo-truth and in that inaccuracy, the exploits can occur which turn a situation against itself by these very dynamics, if not via signs that represent them.

for instance, if every female model walking down a global catwalk starts resembling Mick Jagger, you gotta wonder if the fake god is a narcissist who cannot get enough of their own image, even in an opposite sex form. and what that does to male-female dynamic relations likewise, whose ideal mate is really this, or is it precisely the vulgarity it involves the corruption itself, the information warfare and psychological ops against humanity.

for instance, how do you know the object of desire is not a man dressed up or sex-changed into a woman, and what if paired keys does not address this or there is deception going on, where female appearance is camouflage to exploit those with natural desires, turning this connection of potential love into one subverted by hate, using love against a person as their weakness. and what if this covert, hostile agenda is normalized instead. and thus even a woman-hating male psyche could be representing if not also standing in for women, via simulation or substitution, for social relation.

how do you know the difference between the patterns, how to verify and validate and secure a connection in truth, versus relying on pseudo-truth and ultimately what could be lies, then allowing the exploit the access it needs to corrupt and takeover systems. perhaps most especially in terms of blackmail or setting up a person for a takedown via these methods.

it is proposed that the deceptions in those domain rely upon lies and structures of falsehood, and 'iconic' expectations such that, like modular code and programming, can provide predictable behaviors to exploit as if based on rulesets that can program step by step the interaction according to a preordained pattern. and that as long as truth is secondary to this, whether via money or shared ideology or bias, that in that zone these other activities could be masked or hidden as an agenda, opaque, in waiting.

whereas in grounded truth and intimate connection, truth is the transparent shared condition of being, honest and error-correcting and forms the basis for trust between people, not some other framework. perhaps the only way to know would be a genuine connection in love, removed of illusion, and from here to proceed- anything else could be an illusion, about images, and in this way mirages in the desert of unshared reality, tricksters all around.

love as grounding for intimate social relations and beyond, as it relates with fundamental and foundation truth, as it establishes solid relations between people and within society via shared empirical agenda. one, many.

versus its subversion, mimicking of love, exploiting it, to serve some other end or hidden agenda, and thus false confirmations and shared lies that enable alternate worlds of deception which can occupy houses, entire neighborhoods and cities and states via networks, and beyond, to which a person may find themselves someday lost, every direction misinformation, every sign post a false indication, leading further and further into doom.

thus the assumption of physical connection and the terror of its subversion may create a gap between the shared mind and awareness, and the physical relation with another, even though cryptic communication could occur. and thus asynchronous relations could exist in their place, as if each person is on the other side of a boundary that cannot be surpassed without losing the connection, because it cannot be sustained in the given environment. and yet entanglement could be present in this sharing of truth, especially in that erotic charge where worlds align, and in this, the same issue of keys and secure connection though in a realm of shared memory instead, as the intimate relation, and thus grounding could occur by validating this and securing it as a shared truth, in the realm of atmosphere it occupies.

archetypes, jungian psychology, transference of S -> S' and S' -> S'. a woman walks around with her luscious shoes and wet gleaming nail polish until another turns a corner and becomes transfixed at the beauty, the circuit completed, switches turned on in the shared erotic connection and the alter finds its devote worshipper who receives this extreme pleasure.

the economics of lust and love, these forms of hidden exchange, full of meaning and insight into the prime motivation that moves the world in its health and through its dysfunction, sickness. a terror to not have these dynamics liberated while the ugliness and grotesque can do anything while those so devoted are trapped and confined by rules and regulations as if natural instinct and affections area illegal, while regressions, sadism and misogyny are normalized. impossible for healthy balanced sexual dynamics when they are not allowed for humans, including the full range connections. instead all of this is middle-managed, bureaucratized and exploited by an instilled set of beliefs, at least on the outside, in the world of images.

it is as if there are components of a circuitboard that are made to work with one another, that have collaborative and beneficial dynamics yet are not allowed in proximity to one another based on the components that are by comparison rigged, cheating and taking over the space and rewiring it only for their kinds, leaving areas of isolation and malfunctioning due to the inability to access the other, beyond the structural frameworks that seek to subvert and exploit the connection due to a corruption of its truth. what is unshared or partly true must be adapted to in order to survive. and then only to find later on what is missing, where it is located, and the distance between that may only be temporarily bridged in passing, via a quick glimpse of recognition of what has been lost in the everyday. and this can be the truth of love itself, intimacy, grounded connections.

as with a simulation that seeks to replicate another situation, the fakery can be revealed in its errors, where resolution or detail is lacking and thus whether via inadequate computation or malmodeling, the framework based on and supporting this falsity may begin to warp and skew, potentially to cause accidents and crashes as its compass does not align with the larger circumstance of shared awareness that it seeks to control and to replace. so too with fake men and women, shallow and without depth of imagination, of limited and rigid reasoning, and while 'saying all the right things' it is these 'ideas' that have already and must always have been said before, as if referencing a memory database for fake-insight, correct perspective. again the binary viewpoint is ideal for such a simulative social substitute whereas a paradoxical situation would throw loop after loop into basic functioning and become a turing test to figure out to what degree the internal mechanism can actually calculate something beyond its boundary or threshold of interpretation. thus pregnant pause one thing, silence another as the system reboots and tries to brute force the situation again and again, as if something would be different by merely repeating the trials, trying to look for an error to exploit to retain old existing worldview as shared reality, albeit ungrounded and based upon deception, cloak dagger.

the alchemy of relations, natural with natural, artificial with artificial, and virtual with virtual; yet in their recombination the dynamic exchange of natural with artificial, or natural with virtual, either tending toward the cyborg and in their composite, perhaps something akin to an advanced humanity yet removed of the human and grounded truth as the central value, the antihuman which seeks to destroy and replace the nature at its heart.
 
typologies and permutations, chemical models and their transformations and relations within a geometric context -- not only in terms of being, and thus identity -- ideas themselves: models, hypotheses, awareness.

in this way, understanding such cryptic code and programming can result in capturing pieces, turning positions and players via seeding truth and threshold access, putting the labyrinth on autopilot via these dynamics.

it is thus in symbolic communication that observation often occurs and in awareness of self and others in this context, within existing or potential dimensions. and yet to also perhaps be ungrounded, illiterate in this same way as to how the observations are generated, validated, achieving 'truth' or does it begin as a fiction until removed of all accompanying errors...

again to language and signs, the ecological relation amongst things, the associational structures inherent in perception whether or not conscious of them. to see a sign above a store with stalks of wheat, indicating bread. or grapes, wine. green grapes, white wine, red grapes red wine and so on, to whatever level of detail. infrastructural signage. bees as they relate to flowers and pollination, as this relates to honey. ideas, concepts, dynamics involved in these structural interrelations. massive code as it were, societies envisioned structured around the bee, for instance, by analogy. spiritual significance. deep knowledge of nature and industry, as systems relate and exchange their shared truth.

and so too, in the more profane and superficial realm, viagra and an male male virility and breast implants and signs of hyper-feminine nurturing and the ecosystems of advertising, mass media entertainment, and social relations based on what becomes a structural pseudo-truth, as if mimicry, by which to 'shared consciousness' which can be a false perspective and unsustainable except as artifice, which then is further developed and built upon as if normal and solid when instead it is not of this same nature or instinct. it has different parameters of interaction, including detached sign-based relations where error-correction may be ignored and create a realm of ideological commerce detached from its physical reality, where womens breasts become detached from the sex itself via imposters or female substitutes which stand-in as representers or signs of female being yet seek to subvert the feminine by doing so, that depth of evil hacking, as it also relates breast cancer or other defacements, cutting and scarring of the body and its replacement via another plastic aesthetic, barbie doll, yet potentially Edward in drag, giving come hither looks on the street.

the point is that -belief is not truth-. yet it can function as this if not aware of what is being perceived, having an understanding of the idea and a way of evaluating its integrity. can the belief even be questioned- or is it beyond the boundary of interpretation. and if so, what might it mean if a world of children is released into a world of masquerade, and the basic relations between boys and girls are forged in a world of imposters and exploiters who seek to destroy these very connections via their subversion. or short-circuit development of individuals and their relations via abuse that makes it certain they cannot function in these dynamics, healthily. what if that code is important too, for security in the state, protecting shared value, yet exists outside of software and hardware systems today, or rather- is enabling these types of exchanges via an ideological fortress built of binary religion and schemes that ride alongside the deception, providing tools and carrying water and making change at the sideshows.

what if this is the same context for mass surveillance and these are also 'the politics' on the inside, mapping to the same corruption that becomes oppression of ordinary citizens.

(cf. false perspective in relation to false economy via pseudo-truth, false reality sustained by maintaining status quo; code as facade.)

what if the government spying of the public is being used to secure a private ideology as a perpetual, unchecked, governing power via corrupt language with no accounting for truth in its onesided reasoning.

that is, it is deemed "legal" within a warped and skewed constitution and is essentially BAD FAITH, functioning against citizens, its subtext political domination and removing of enemies via guiding to cattle chutes.

the programmatic aspect of this- you say certain things and they, like code words automatically trigger certain dynamics, as if via mechanism. and thus the [sign] of something, merely referencing 'the constitution' by someone who is a 'constitutional lawyer' could be viewed legitimate because what they declare cannot be overpowered by another interpretation in binary terms, yet similarly *ignores* all contrary and falsifying facts via ideology, and therefore relies upon, adds and extends errors into the shared state framework (like bugs and malicious code) that can be further exploited by subsequent policy actions -- yet which are never held to account in an empirical framework of shared truth - beyond language (!) meaning that the [signs], words and letters equate with this grounded truth instead of the ones and zeros of truth and falsity via logical reasoning, whereby acts of state become acts of literature, via private interpretation said to be and validated as 'the reading' though based upon these flaws that, in this A=B subjectivity, deteriorate the state in its functioning due to the loss of accurate grounding and accountability in truth, of and as truth, and instead only and increasingly partial, serving fewer and fewer. it is not that someone cannot propose ideas, it is that there is no error-correction mechanism to stop false perspectives from taking over the interpretation and thus an imbalanced framework, a corrupted code results. and mass surveillance contrary to privacy and businesses, franchises and supermarkets and shoe stores surveilling citizens is a vast obscenity to the laws of the shared state-- and yet a certain empowered population likewise seems to believe this is their right and proper managerial place, providing oversight of others, and thus tangibly 'represents their will' to promote and succeed in such an agenda.

beneath this is the problem of reasoning in binary terms, as if a fencing competition, points scored and one side is victorious. or jousting match, someone brutally dismounted from their vehicle if not impaled. thus fear of losing and losing face, in binary terms.

versus the greatness of ideas, of truth and concepts and modeling, the activity of considering things and sharing discoveries and knowledge and how terrible it has become in an age of universalized communication tools, the limit becoming ourselves, our limits and lack of imagination and the ability to think beyond flawed approaches while stuck in serial (binary) language. perhaps most notable is the role of theory, both in negative consequences yet also the metaphysical and tacit knowledge developed in tentative frameworks of interpretation that could and should be salvaged and brought into common empirical error-corrected realms, for what is true of what is theorized remains true, yet should not be reliant on falsity or errored-structures to maintain the hypotheses. because the gap between pT and T, and pT and F is the realm of the exploit, the subversion, which can change the stated direction of inquiry via its effects, whether knowingly by subversion or accident, hijacked by other unaccounted hidden forces.

(note: it is this realm of partial truth or pseudo-truth that is the realm of paradox. essentially up until now it has been referenced as an inaccuracy, whereby A=B is considered false, due to limits of explanation in email format- more likely it would be said B=B equals not-A and thus would be false, though perhaps this should occur beyond a,b notation and just use t,f, such that T=F is the paradoxical condition, whereby what is true about it (T) would need to separated from what is false (F) within a realm of pseudo-truth, such that: