So maybe I should rephrase to something like : Assange was morally obliged to publish clinton's dirty deals and by doing so he helped trump, who is his enemy. All in all, pretty ironic. He could have published it all at once, or filtered out stories carefully with collaborating media outlets. Either of those approaches would have been educational. Instead, he published them so as to "maximize impact" -- but that impact, which included holding back stuff to publish for the weekend before the election (when nobody would have time to audit the material), and to defend Trump after the Access Hollywood release -- was not an educational one. I've never met a single
On 11/24/18 6:15 PM, juan wrote: person who has actually read, say, Killary's speech to Wall St. or teased out any connections between DNC donors and anyone else. The maximized, uneducational impact was just to get commoners revved up and screaming, like Trump, "I Love WikiLeaks" in a "git your gubment hands off my Medicare" way. Look at the header here - https://twitter.com/suzi3d - the goal of Team WikiLeaks is to maximize instances of Assange's face. This is what cryptobros WikiLeaks has become: 10 PRINT "ASSANGE" 20 GOTO 10 With something like 10-20 years remaining to halt global warming, Team WikiLeaks will be happy to run the above program until the day we all die. They could have done so much by sharing their ample platform with worthy causes, but that would have caused "brand confusion" and god forbid somebody be confused. That's far too much like education.