Which matters enough that Jews are fleeing, and have largely fled, France.
nonsense. Your anti-muslim, pro-jew-kristian-nazis rants get tiring - and are wholly irrelevant.
The problem with your views is that you as a racist want to explain politics in terms of 'race'. Note that of course there's no Jewish race. Jewism is just a pseudo culture.
Jews vote on their ethnicity, not on their economic class.
more highly stupid nonsense. According to wikimierda there are 6 millions (HAHA!) jews in the american cesspool. So let's say 3 million jew voters. Completely IRRELEVANT figure. And fuck the jews anyway. Hopefully the fact that jew non-culture is murderous supremacist garbage has been made clear enough.
And if, not what 'race' do you think they belong to?
What matters is not what race I think they belong to, but what race they think they belong to.
there's no jew race.
Persuade them of that.
fuck them. Jewism is a theocratic supremacist mafioso club. Not. A. Race.
So at this point, I have to rhetorically ask, what class do you think you belong to?
Reactionaries don't believe in the Marxist class analysis, neither did Lysander Spooner, whom you claim to be an adherent of.
sonny, I don't subscribe to the marxist 'class analysis'. I subscribe to the LIBERTARIAN class analysis that piece of shit jew marx PLAGIARIZED. here's ONE of the only TWO decent articles that narcho fascist outlet mises.org has https://mises.org/library/classical-liberal-roots-marxist-doctrine-classes educate your-self.
The reactionary class categorization is priests (including professors, the mainstream media, public intellectuals, lawyers, judges, etc) warriors (including officers, soldiers, police, rentacops, mercs, etc) merchants (capitalists, entrepeneurs, businessmen, and such) and the masses.
In which categorization I am primarily a merchant, trying out for the priesthood. But I spend more time on merchant stuff.
you are either a member of the govcorp mafia (and you probably are), or else you're poor and a victim of the crimes commited by govcorp. So yeah, I'll assume you're an americunt govcorp criminal. As a matter of fact your fascist propaganda makes you a moral accomplice of them, even if you're not stealing, torturing and killing like your americunt govcorp officers do.
And what are your political beliefs? The only reason I ask is because the very first author that shows up on jim.com is Lysander Spooner, but, YOU NEVER READ A WORD HE WROTE.
You interpret Lysander Spooner as a commie. I interpret him otherwise.
I don't 'interpret' him as a commie, and I'm not a commie either. You as a fascist clown are the obvious commie. Any retard who gets the A of the ABC of political theory knows that trumpist totalitarianism IS practical communism. Look at the 18 TRILLIONS bank bailout. That's communism. So I stand by what I said : you NEVER read a SINGLE WORD that spooner wrote. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/spooner-a-plan-for-the-abolition-of-slave... Educate yourself. That's spooner who correctly wanted to make piece-of-shit slave owners pay for their crimes. Such a commie.
Something like anarchocapitalism worked in saga period Iceland
LMAO! You are an ignoramus parroting the garbage that fascist jew friedman invented. Iceland was a SLAVE SOCIETY at that time and run by FUCKING PIRATES. THE THIEVING, MURDERING VIKINGS. But hey, maybe that's as far as your 'understanding' of 'freedom' goes.
because it was a state enforced theocracy,
Just read the nonsense you write. Iceland was 'anarchistic', THEOCRATIC and state enforced. Get a dictionary.
I have therefore come to the conclusion that the best system is a long established and stable monarchy,
So, change your piece of shit website to reflect your Newfound High Knowledge.
...And so we get a ruling elite that fails to hold together.
And why is that a problem for LIBERTARIANS?
One King three thousand miles is a lesser problem than a thousand kings three miles away. The loss of cohesion in the ruling elite leads to anarcho tyranny, not anarcho capitalism. Yesterday I was trying to transfer a sum of money while avoiding tax impact, and one bank thought the legalities worked one way, and the other bank thought the legalities worked a different way, and they could not agree because the laws and regulations are complicated, intrusive, obscure, incomprehensible, there is no one who actually knows what that mean, except that no matter what you do, if they want to charge you with something, they will probably find something to charge you with.
yes, that's how statism works. It has nothing to do with 'democracy'.
.... So you don't have any definition for "left"? or "right" for that matter.4
Right and left were defined in the FrenchRevolution.
And the right defended monarchy, feudalism and theocracy while the left opposed it.
What the french left supported in place of monarchy, feudalism, and theocracy
By the way, do you know that the americunt 'revolution' and the french revolution were basically the same scam? With more than a few of the same clowns involved in both, and the french monarchy bankrolling the americunts? OOPS. So what's your take on the americunt 'revolution'? I guess you DON"T support it, so you are moving BACK TO ENGLAND? If you are a monarchist you must realize that the americunt government is illegitimate and the king of england the rightful owner of the 'land' and the people in it.
So AGAIN, why does jim.com pretend to be libertarian when you are a RIGHT WINGER, AND SO A MONARCHIST?
I want liberty.
No you don't. And answer the question. Why does your piece of shit site mention libertarians and pseudo libertarians instead of CHRISTIAN MONARCHISTS.