On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 18:30:37 -0700 Steven Schear <schear.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
The way I think this could work is legislatures should establish a "friction-free" market penetration percentage (the point at which the difficulty of a participant great lessens due to network effects). When a participant exceeds this threshold their market competitors can sue in federal court to have the market leader stripped of their IP used in that market.
That sounds a bit too complicated. Like you said, the obvious solution is for the government to not create the monopolies in the first place. So all the 'intelectual property' scams like copyright, patents, so called NDAs and the rest have to go. Then again, the only reason government exists is to enforce that sort of criminal garbage so... Well at least one can laugh at the retarded 'progressives' who think that government protects them from monopolies. Then again, those retarded 'progressives' are pretty blind to governmnt failures for some reason...
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 6:23 PM juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 16:06:00 -0700 Steven Schear <schear.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/18/eu-fine-google-android-an...
Instead of fining Google, if the EU really wants to set and example of
how
to reign in monopolies, they should recind the IP privilege they granted Google by stripping them of their copyrights (and perhaps patents).
strip them of patents, copyright and throw the assholes in jail...for being an arm of the government? Hmmm. Not likely to happen.
So the government 'fines' google, and google pays using the money they steal from the public. Guess what? among many other criminal activties, google is a tax collector.