with folks that refuse to run JavaScript Not "JavaScript"; "Unverified, potentially malicious code with a rich history of exploits inside a frame I use to navigate the online world". It wouldn't matter if the code was LISP or Python; the problem isn't the language, it's the context.
That said, I do run Javascript, albiet through NoScript. I just wish there were more fine-grained policy restrictions I could place on it, such as "No XmlHttpRequest/Websocket" or "No browser introspection (fonts, boundaries, etc.)", and let webapps that are trying to fingerprint me without my permission just crash and burn. On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:27:07 -0700 (PDT) "Al Billings" <albill@openbuddha.com> wrote:
Only if you wish it was "the good old days" but then this is the list with folks that refuse to run JavaScript and don't understand why anyone would want to use twitter, as I recall.
Al
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org="mailto:adam@cypherspace.org">> wrote: Well you should say the web developers regressed since then.
Adam