https://www.c19vaxreactions.com/ https://www.openvaers.com/
https://vaers.hhs.gov/ https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/immunization/reporting-adver... https://coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/ https://www.tga.gov.au/form/national-adverse-events-following-immunisation-a...
https://humansarefree.com/2021/07/countries-where-covid-19-vaccination-is-ma... https://www.statista.com/statistics/1191568/reported-deaths-from-covid-by-ag... https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254271/us-total-number-of-covid-cases-b... https://archive.ph/sDyA0 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moderna#2017 https://www.lareb.nl/coronameldingen Australia are DAENS database http://vigiaccess.org/ https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adve... https://www.adrreports.eu/en/index.html https://vaccinetracker.ecdc.europa.eu/public/extensions/COVID-19/vaccine-tra... https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2021-0475_PT.html https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F\_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+40983312 https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F\_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+40995439 https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+42325700 https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+42287887 https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/04/covid-19-vac... https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=on&PAGENO=2&PERPAGE=10&ESORT=AGE&REVERSESORT=&VAX=(COVID19 search: eudravigilance: tozinameron https://www.timesofisrael.com/hospital-blamed-over-womens-death-from-heart-i... https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.26132 Thrombocytopenia https://thepulse.one/2021/11/25/pfizer-was-aware-of-over-50k-serious-covid-v... https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/18928-dead-1-8-million-injured-50-serious-... https://corona-ausschuss.de/ https://reitschuster.de/post/die-erschreckende-impf-bilanz-meines-hausarztes... https://2020news.de/en/whistleblower-from-berlin-nursing-home-the-terrible-d... https://2020news.de/videos/20210213_online_Ad-hoc_6_Impftod_in_Berliner_Alte... https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/whistleblower-video-exposes-forced-v... https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Verordnung-EG-Nr.-507-2006.pd... https://www.pei.de/DE/institut/organisation/fuehrungsteam/fuehrungsteam-node... https://www.berlin.de/sen/gpg/ueber-uns/leitung/senatorin/ https://2020news.de/risiko-impfstoff-immer-mehr-tote/ https://2020news.de/riesen-skandal-aufgedeckt-covid-19-impfung-zerstoert-uns... https://2020news.de/ema-26-849-gemeldete-impfschaeden/ https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-... " EU and WHO databases prove we are being lied to Vaccine injuries and fatalities are staggeringly high. Information about vaccine injuries makes it completely immoral and unethical to force people to get these vaccines. If people want the vaccine fine. But no one should be forced or coerced to get a prophylactic vaccine with these risks. " https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/MTAG/2021/11/30/file_attachments... https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/42600713/Missouri,_State_of_et_al_v... https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/42474165/State_of_Missouri_et_al_v_... https://www.sixthcircuitappellateblog.com/ https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46288 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/03/31/2021-06718/temporary-ha... https://www.insider.com/supreme-court-says-bidens-moratorium-on-tenant-evict... https://www.foxnews.com/politics/klain-vaccine-coronvirus-mandate " Biden is acting like a dictator and abusing the rule making process. His mandate is unconstitutional and if challenged will likely fail. There are limits to what edicts a president or administrative agency like OSHA can issue. Normally an OSHA rule takes 4-10 years to promulgate. The exception they’re using is the Emergency temporary standard (ETS) it’s an interim rule not a final rule. They used it for health care workers in July. That ETS is valid for 180 days and then they must go through the normal rule making process. That requires publishing in the federal register, and 30 days for public comments. I don’t have time right now for a lesson on the APA and rule making procedures, sorry. You can read about it here: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46288 Properly challenged I highly doubt this rule would stand. That’s why they did it that way. An ETS obviates the regular rules for promulgating administrative rules. Those procedures can underhandedly avoid congressional approval and really aren’t democratic at all but at least there are procedures and they are not followed with an ETS. Other than challenging the constitutionality of the rule there’s another path that will make this mandate useless - enforcement. The thing about enforcement is that some government agency has to find, follow up, enforce (which is not easy - how do they inspect the records? What process is the violator is entitled to? What does a hearing look like? Appeals? Penalties?…) They can write in penalties all they want but actually bringing the hammer down on a business or individual is quite a different matter. Resistance to these edicts are essential. This is a presidential power grab beyond anything we’ve seen before. It’s dangerous. It’s frightening. People and businesses need to refuse to comply. The government doesn’t have the resources or ability to enforce this if people and businesses resist. I add these two excerpts from the linked document because it shows how deep Biden had to dig to use this ETS workaround. It hasn’t been used since the 1983 asbestos ETS was invalidated by the courts. One: In addition to addressing a grave danger to employees, an ETS must also be necessary to protect employees from that danger. In Asbestos Info. Ass’n, the court invalidated the asbestos ETS for the additional reason that OSHA had not demonstrated the necessity of the ETS. The court cited, among other factors, the duplication between the respirator requirements of the ETS and OSHA’s existing standards requiring respirator use. The court dismissed OSHA’s argument that the ETS was necessary because the agency felt that the existing respiratory standards were “unenforceable absent actual monitoring to show that ambient asbestos particles are so far above the permissible limit that respirators are necessary to bring employees’ exposure within the PEL of 2.0 f/cc.”25 The court determined that “fear of a successful judicial challenge to enforcement of OSHA’s permanent standard regarding respirator use hardly justifies resort to the most dramatic weapon in OSHA’s enforcement arsenal.” Two: OSHA has used its ETS authority sparingly in its history and not since the asbestos ETS promulgated in 1983. As shown in Table A-1, in the nine times OSHA has issued an ETS, the courts have fully vacated or stayed the ETS in four cases and partially vacated the ETS in one case.29 Of the five cases that were not challenged or that were fully or partially upheld by the courts, OSHAissued a permanent standard either within the six months required by the statute or within several months of the six-month period and always within one year of the promulgation of the ETS.30 Each of these cases, however, occurred before 1980, after which a combination of additional federal laws and court decisions added additional procedural requirements to the OSHA rulemaking process. OSHAdid not attempt to extend the ETS’s expiration date in any of these cases. Although the courts have not ruled directly on an attempt by OSHA to solely extend the life of an ETS, in 1974, the U.S. Court Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held in Florida Peach Growers Ass’n v. United States Department of Labor that OSHA was within its authority to amend an ETS without going through the normal rulemaking process.31 The court stated that “it is inconceivable that Congress, having granted the Secretary the authority to react quickly in fast-breaking emergency situations, intended to limit his ability to react to developments subsequent to his initial response.”32 The court also recognized the difficulty OSHA may have in promulgating a standard within six months due to the notice and comment requirements of the OSHAct, stating that in the case of OSHA seeking to amend an ETS to expand its focus, “adherence to subsection (b) procedures would not be in the best interest of employees, whom the Act is designed to protect. Biden tried a similar tactic with the eviction moratorium. He abused his authority by using the CDC to issue a ruling that claimed the eviction moratorium was a public health issue. The reason he did this was to circumvent the need to go through Congress. The CDC eviction moratorium was issued to address areas with "heightened levels of community transmission in order to respond to recent, unexpected developments in the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the rise of the Delta variant." The eviction moratorium issued by Trump, was extended but then expired in May. That was probably unconstitutional too, but no one challenged it. From then on the eviction moratorium was issued by the CDC and was unconstitutional, as were the extensions. It should have been challenged earlier. And Biden knew it was unconstitutional and expected the S. Ct. Ruling. So Biden has tried to institute unconstitutional edicts before and failed. He seems to ignore that he’s been rebuked by the Supreme Court but has decided why not try again. That’s what’s happening here. There have only been 9 OSHA Emergency temporary standards (ETS) issued in the past. Four were fully vacated by the courts, one partially vacated. The others followed the APA and promulgated permanent rules within the required 6 months. That’s not going to happen with the vaccine mandate for private employers. For one thing, the use of the Administrative Procedures Act is not the same as it was in the 1980s, at all. Controversial rules can’t be promulgated that quickly. And most importantly, this ETS vaccine mandate doesn’t stand up to a Grave Danger or Necessity judicial review. It needs to be tested in the courts though. Once this vaccine mandate for private employers is actually published then it can be challenged, and it should be. Currently it looks like the governors of Texas, Florida, South Dakota and Arizona are going to challenge it. I think some large employers will be needed to. I’ll be curious to see which ones step up for this fight. No matter what people think about vaccines they should be outraged by this abuse of power. I am. And I’m scared. Because it seems pretty clear that Biden knows this is unconstitutional and is doing it anyway, despite taking an oath to uphold the constitution. That should frighten us all. "