Wow! Are you ENTERTAINED?!!?? :D :D This is gettin good, folks - from unlawful "cake baking avoidance" now to "unlawful LGBTQNPC+ propaganda film creation avoidance, with literal threat of jail time". Ho! HO HO HO! Oh yeah folks, this gon be dang fine event if the autharataes follow up on this one :D Bring. It. On! State Demands Christian US Filmmakers Make Same-Sex Films or Face Jail Time https://www.westernjournal.com/state-demands-christian-us-filmmakers-make-se... https://bbs.thegoyimknow.to/t/state-demands-christian-us-filmmakers-make-sam... A Christian couple who owns a media company is suing the state of Minnesota after being threatened with fines and imprisonment if they refuse to make films involving same-sex marriage. Carl and Angel Larsen, through their company Telescope Media Group, want to enter the wedding industry, but due to their religious beliefs do not want to create films celebrating same-sex marriages. Minnesota’s Human Rights Act stipulates that if the owners produce films about traditional Christian marriages between one man and one woman, they must also produce films about unions that violate their Christian views, CBN News reported. http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2018/october/christian-filmmakers-appeal-to-8... The religious liberty law firm Alliance Defending Freedom, which is representing the Larsens in the suit, said in a Tuesday news release http://www.adfmedia.org/News/PRDetail/10627 that the couple faces steep fines, including compensatory and punitive damages of up to $25,000, and up to 90 days in prison if they fail to comply with Minnesota’s public accommodation law. … ADF successfully sued the state of Colorado on behalf of Christian baker Jack Phillips, securing his right to decline to make custom wedding cakes celebrating same-sex marriages. In a 7-2 ruling, http://www.adfmedia.org/files/MasterpieceCakeshopOpinionSCOTUS.pdf the Supreme Court found Phillips had a legitimate claim “that using his artistic skills to make an expressive statement, a wedding endorsement in his own voice and of his own creation, has a significant First Amendment speech component and implicates his deep and sincere religious beliefs.” The Court went on to note, “That consideration was compromised, however, by the (Colorado Civil Rights) Commission’s treatment of Phillips’ case, which showed elements of a clear and impermissible hostility toward the sincere religious beliefs motivating his objection.” …