On 10/11/2015 07:49 PM, Travis Biehn wrote:
I'd rather have what you call 'lazy' over nothing.
Look, I mean no disrespect to Cryptome. But I do think that there ought to be a warning for users to protect themselves, if they don't want their access logged by everyone and their little yellow dog.
The ideal is all distribution modes available: "Keep the info off the dark web, off the deep web and in the search indexes."
Cryptome shows up on google searches. Your onion does not.
Well, Cryptome has been around for about 20 years, so hey ;) But Google is indexing it. And it shows up well enough in relevant searches. But I haven't been promoting it very much.
-Travis
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 10/11/2015 06:20 PM, Travis Biehn wrote:
A billboard doesn't need much 'security.' *shrug*
Well, there are the access logs ;)
It ought to be an onion service, no? No sure bet, of course, but better than nothing. In my opinion.
Putting it all on users is awfully lazy, I think.
Travis
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 8:18 PM John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
I would not have expected Cryptome to be on shared hosting ;) But yes, that would explain it.
Shared is cheap, so are we. Shared is vuln, so are we. So are the others despite credentials and billion-dollar armaments and above all else secrecy and shallow oversight. That explains it.