bethany you are obviously NOT a journalist... its called exploitation i dont remember the images of the baby at hiroshima or the girl burned naked running in vietnam having the journalists fat head in the frame guess who gets their picture took with dead bodies? smiling american soldiers have in afghanistan and nazi's - i am sure you can look those images up for yourself i wont be a party to it just because you dont understand ethics doesnt mean they dont exist being filmed with dead bodies is absolutely a breech of journalistic ethics ++++++++++++++++++ thanks alexis for your analysis of tor i heartily agree with your conclusion look into a blow up of @emptywheel had regarding her protections of @pierre when the whole ukranian thing was revealed she has to do a lot of dancing to dodge the bullets coming her way ... when i get time later i will look it up for you On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Bethany <groundhog593@riseup.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
its not a 'claim' watch his film that was up for an academy award
there is a scene in mogadishu where he is in the morgue there is a dead
On 06/04/15 12:59 PM, Cari Machet wrote: body and him in the scene he is standing right next to it - the person was hit by a drone strike
no journalist gets filmed with dead bodies it is unethical it never
happens
perhaps if you were a journalist in the field you would understand
Absolutely. The first thing any good journalist should think when he's investigating drone strikes and is permitted to witness the examination of a body of a victim is "shit, don't film me here, where I am! So gauche!"
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Alexis Wattel <alexiswattel@gmail.com <mailto:alexiswattel@gmail.com> <alexiswattel@gmail.com>> wrote:
Speaking about facts checking: intrigued by these allegations I looked up wiki on Omydiar, and his network association is said to have partnered with the CIA, which is not generally all about "philanthropy", although this claim lack any reference.
Would someone know why is the Agency mentioned there?
Aside from that, financed projects include "mobile intelligence" for prospectors and deploying banks onto mobile phones to make sure everyone even in Africa pays his fees to the landlords. They even dare to say it's cheaper than cash. I wonder how that is.
Anyway... Wild allegations are very entertaining, but seriously what's the real meaning of this about Tor? Because no technical evidence suggest it is "backdoored" (whatever that would mean, this is a trendy word, makes the one who says it sound so l33t in journalism circles).
On the other hand, Tor devs are more and more often prone on reminding that traffic analysis/correlation is not part of their threat model. The problem is that it is nowadays a definitely proven capability of adversaries.
I really can't help thinking this is a deliberate desire of keeping Tor at government's reach because the eternal argument they oppose do not stand. They say that randomized wait times at each relay would make the traffic too slow. But I remember using Tor 8 years ago when it took forever to load a Web page, and still did I use it in spite of this major extra effort, because anonymous surfing was such a blast. Today the network is fast enough to be able to swap 25% speed for a massive increase of anonymity. The other solution, randomized length of packets with dummy padding discarded at each relay would impact even less on responsiveness.
I honestly can't see why they legitimately refuse to implement this. They seem to think that the need to observe both ends is too hard. Did they hear about the BGP routing attack that targeted Iceland? Funny how the Silk Road server was found a month later in... Oh shit, Iceland.
When you claim to protect activists with government money, you'd better not show dubious intentions if people trust are what you depend on. Because that's why Tor was opened at first. The government officials needed to hide among civilian traffic. They do need the people to run nodes.
Le 6 avril 2015 15:04:21 CEST, xezha <xezha@riseup.net <mailto:xezha@riseup.net> <xezha@riseup.net>> a écrit :
I think I may have to leave this list.
Can you really not tell the difference between a real article and something made up/joke/propaganda? Please be a little more critical and back up for claims before slandering someones name. Even 5 minutes of research with google will demonstrate that you are the only source of ANY claims about Jeremy Scahills unethical journalism. You seem to have a screw loose.
Xe
On 06/04/15 02:35, Cari Machet wrote:
thank you!!
i just want to say that @jeremyscahill took a selfie with a (murdered) dead body which no & i mean no journalist does - no one ... he is a very sick capitalist fascist
he has done more than this but i wont go on & on
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com <mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com> <juan.g71@gmail.com> <mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com> <juan.g71@gmail.com> <mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com> <juan.g71@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 22:29:06 -0700 Seth <list@sysfu.com <mailto:list@sysfu.com> <list@sysfu.com>
<mailto:list@sysfu.com> <list@sysfu.com> <mailto:list@sysfu.com> <list@sysfu.com>> wrote:
> It's about damn time ;) > >
http://chronicle.su/2015/03/07/greenwald-scahill-step-down-from-the-intercep...
> >
is this some kind of stupid 'joke' ?
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 <tel:646-436-7795> carimachet@gmail.com <mailto:carimachet@gmail.com> <carimachet@gmail.com> <mailto:carimachet@gmail.com> <carimachet@gmail.com> <mailto:carimachet@gmail.com> <carimachet@gmail.com> AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 <tel:%2B49%20152%2011779219> Reykjavik +354 894 8650 <tel:%2B354%20894%208650> Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> <https://twitter.com/carimachet> <https://twitter.com/carimachet> <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187
Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com <mailto:carimachet@gmail.com> <carimachet@gmail.com> AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187
Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVIs7MAAoJELSH/HSoRBscScYH/i1n6ZzH77ZMwxNtHVFgX8kb LCE18yEIlrh4fPPUyMC+JHOjR56jWJr6YTnr4XI359k+pVpOUujXd/LZq9655ws2 RS3Hs8dxhuYm4S3EdpIssEeN0wu5Z0+zOeoO2IE3VR2lO4sxe9tKRCjV5sSLUxGm rIPc7BaknrGQjQoTtufJYVodT63uvKZ7r3OqMx/bwOIU60edcQrLjKAFaGeJ/Ges aqrhd+QUE7DvpiRPv6BKfsOpcZT+isk2FyMmp/1muTQ/k+huZ85HwP7Ytc+DnKpj d6lr06iQWaXFQD926cMsJIInsOQA6Sc2prig/MfF0XKTuzP5w7TQIhFojhf01Bk= =9tv1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.