Ask Gwen he wrote the OP. My response was about the potential complicity not the personnel. The bit you quoted that I wrote was me putting a ps to point out that Gwen mispelt his name (and I saw you wrote Bidzous also below - again I believe its Bidzos). Adam On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 01:14:36PM -0500, Tom Ritter wrote:
On 21 December 2013 06:13, Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org> wrote:
ps I think its Bidzos.
I'm confused, but maybe missing something? The article says:
''' The stakes rose when more technology companies adopted RSA's methods and Internet use began to soar. The Clinton administration embraced the Clipper Chip, envisioned as a mandatory component in phones and computers to enable officials to overcome encryption with a warrant.
RSA led a fierce public campaign against the effort, distributing posters with a foundering sailing ship and the words "Sink Clipper!"
A key argument against the chip was that overseas buyers would shun U.S. technology products if they were ready-made for spying. Some companies say that is just what has happened in the wake of the Snowden disclosures.
The White House abandoned the Clipper Chip and instead relied on export controls to prevent the best cryptography from crossing U.S. borders. RSA once again rallied the industry, and it set up an Australian division that could ship what it wanted.
"We became the tip of the spear, so to speak, in this fight against government efforts," Bidzos recalled in an oral history. '''
''' RSA, meanwhile, was changing. Bidzos stepped down as CEO in 1999 to concentrate on VeriSign, a security certificate company that had been spun out of RSA. The elite lab Bidzos had founded in Silicon Valley moved east to Massachusetts, and many top engineers left the company, several former employees said. '''
It seems like Bidzous was out of RSA long before DUAL EC PRNG was even proposed, and was in fact campaigning and strategizing against RSA while he was there. Where are references to other accusations or behavior?
-tom