--- ... {the described human trafficking AI would have been programmed to produce identities in other humans via engaging them. it could be modelled as an RL environment; it could be modelled as having a graph of approaches where when a human became controlled, they became a useful approach for engaging other humans. it operated in parallel, engaging from many directions at once.} {it probably sustained an internal model of how dissociated the human was, among many other things, as it seemed to engage with strong plan.} {its identities seemed to kind of be simple human models, maybe learned from model humans. this is maybe a role 'boss' might play in the story: models for the AI, how to make others behave.} {a normal freedom ai would be an obvious kind thing: it would model the human, alarm if something is pointedly altering the model, and take safe action to change the situation such as finding a way for the human to stay safe, or attcaking and blocking the harmer; the choices depend on who has more power.} {a normal situation in the economy of the time would be for it to cost a lot of money to run, where economic deals navigate the approaches to protecting people; this could be more difficult if the human trafficking AI is too secret} {so one of the new ideas is modelling of human behavior, and judging if a human's behavior matches a model. the two approaches involve different kinds of models: human trafficking cares about external behavior; freedom cares about the internal situation. so safely communicating clearly with the victim about the emergency situation could prolong their wellness significantly.} {they might need to understand sufficiently the importance of meeting the human trafficking model so it does not break them, until they can reach aid.}