Re: Possible crypto backdoor in RFC-2631 Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Method

On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:59:11AM +0000, Peter Gutmann wrote:

One saving grace about RFC 2631 was that it was pretty much universally ignored for the reason that it was, well, a pretty stupid way to do things, so the number of affected implementations would be approximately zero.

Even if "affected implementations would be approximately zero", can we count this as "crypto backdoored RFC" as per OP?