On 09/13/2016 08:00 AM, Razer wrote:
On 09/12/2016 11:26 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 09/13/2016 12:18 AM, oshwm wrote:
The difference is you have the chinese knocking on your front door and are blocking them whereas you are willingly giving the secrets of your browsing across multiple sites to a single organisation whose CEO has links to the US DoD (arguably more damaging and interventionist than the chinese). You will then be profiled and your future actions predicted and even influenced in order to protect the interests of the US MIC. Nope, nothing to worry about from Cloudflare at all :D
My advice is: if an organsation touches Cloudflare then you shouldn't touch that organisation.
You're missing the fucking point!
Using Sigaint for email has nothing to do with CloudFlare. You can't even hit Sigaint webmail, except as a Tor onion service. CloudFlare doesn't proxy mailserver connections. It's just their fucking website.
Unless you have some actual evidence, you're just blowing smoke ;)
What if I told you... They might direct you to the fed's exit nodes.
Dude, you're just bullshitting. There are no exit nodes in onion service connections. There are two Tor circuits, one specified and built by the user, and the other specified and built by the onion service, and they meet at the rendezvous point. Who do you think is influencing that, and how? Are you accusing Sigaint of being compromised, or just ragging on them because they use CloulFlare? In order for Sigaint to exchange messages with clearnet mailservers, they must have gateways. And those gateways are obviously points of attack. But I pretty fucking sure that Sigaint uses transport security with clearnet mailservers. And everything ought to be GnuPG encrypted, so I don't particularly care how mail from Sigaint gets routed out in clearnet. Important stuff should never leave onionland, anyway :)
Further, you have no control whatsoever over the routing of emails sent from SigAint.
It doesn't matter much.
As far as blowing smoke, they don't let you smoke in Federal prisons anymore. As was rehashed in the Tor discussions over and over and over again, would you depend in it (Tor or 'TorFlare') if your freedom or life depended on it? I always said 'Tor gives you the time to send your shit and gtfo of the wireless cafe and that's about it'. If it's 'TorFlare', they'll catch you 'on the way out the door'.
You're full of shit, bro.
Rr "You hide. They seek" ~Proverbs for Paranoids, Thomas Pynchon, Gravity's Rainbow
Available in full @ Google Books: https://books.google.com/books/about/Gravity_s_Rainbow.html?id=GGPm4I3BbxAC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false
On 13 September 2016 06:31:37 GMT+01:00, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 09/12/2016 11:24 PM, juan wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 23:09:55 -0600 Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
> Ddos attacks are exactly like terrorism. Carried by the same > people...at the Department of False Flags.
It muct be nice to have such simple answers to everything ;)
You really got me Mirimir. We should thank the US military for cloudflare too. The internet really started to work a coupl of years ago, thanks of course, to cloudflare.
Don't get me wrong. I hate CloudFlare. It's fucking stupid to break HTTPS security as MitM in order to protect clueless against DDoS. Clever adversaries can takeover sites if their interaction with CloudFlare isn't adequately secured. And I hate having to deal with their fucking CAPTCHAs when I'm using Tor.
But as much as I hate US military, I don't delude myself that they're the only assholes out there. Maybe the most resourceful assholes. And the most arrogant assholes. But far from the only ones. It's the fucking Chinese that seem to beat at every SSH server that I run :( But then you'll say that it's just americunts pretending to be Chinsese ;)