-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/04/2017 01:31 AM, juan wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 21:01:56 -0800 Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
... and the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7.
I submit that as evidence suggesting that "rayzer" is a gov't agent. And a pretty stupid one at that.
A quick search for "wtc7 mud liquefied" doesn't return anything relevant so it would seem that rayzer's anti conspiracy nutcassery is original to him. Though admitedly I didn't spend more than 10 seconds searching.
The official excuse for WTC 7's symmetrical collapse is that the side of the building /not/ shown clearly in photos was "scooped out" by falling debris. (The photos I have seen do indicate substantial damage to the facade from falling debris.) This is not consistent with a symmetrical collapse as observed - the support columns destroyed by the "scoop" provided no vertical support, so the load was distributed unevenly and the building would have sagged in that direction when it lost global structural integrity. But never mind that, the words "pancake collapse" and some animated cartoons prove it fell straight down into its own basement all by itself. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYcaAVAAoJEECU6c5Xzmuq+DUH+gI1R8LP8uSed0R9EBrR46mS 5xzMHzIZLbect7k6u5cCcCPijPPc4t7cgidQ5He4X+NTihe+YXXhMxFmsR+BFb7x NZStdIE3RGIf9UfAVmkWb4HVbcRVQKPgX+veG+5zliRJHShRconyRqDTv020VEi3 dVRrgqy+B7tbBgauG6EMakNmEno/wrZMLV8wX0swD4tF8VaIQTbQM36b0+RhiW8C g1BcOQ4n6Fk0DMXi7VupEQ4SIroyDw3IyWm2kELcoxmJY+ryRjIIGM2liRbu55io j0ajmL3o2GR1iInmi3Y2fUOP3efjipTBjM9pBeeEXSL3byesNF3cogf5IPcOSYA= =BwY/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----