Professor Steven Hawking states, “A theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements. It must
accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few
arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations… But if
the theory was mathematically consistent and always gave predictions that agreed with observations, we
could be reasonably confident that it was the right one…”
. The World Bank estimates that from 2018 to 2030, $46.8 trillion dollars of investment are necessary
to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
B. The UN financial system is riddled with fraud, so why in the world should $46.8 trillion dollars
(referencing A above) be funneled through the dilapidated UN system with reasonable assurance of
achieving the global goals? It is a nearly criminal proposal.
C. The UN’s 2018-2019 global operating budget is $5.4B, with a forecasted revenue of $552.31M.
That is a fiscally failing financial model, and in no way supports the theory of running $46.8T
through the UN system and achieving any goals.
Meanwhile, AB InBev has announced their own sustainability goals for 2025 and is in a far better
leadership position to achieve these goals than the UN, especially with crypto and blockchain technology.
Referencing AB InBev’s income statement below, operating in 100 countries (with staff and a product
distribution channel in each country) the firm is running a very good global business - far more
sophisticated than the outdated UN model globally.
In short, there are only a handful of firms (AB InBev & UNIC just happen to be #1 in respective categories)
that can expertly roll out a new global cryptocurrency with a market cap over $1T. Furthermore, if the $46T
of the UN’s world goal finance was on this system, the market cap would be significant, just as Trent Eady
suggests above. This system would generate profit, offering simple financial services to the global
population at far lower costs to the consumer.