27 Nov
2013
27 Nov
'13
1:16 a.m.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Ted Smith <tedks@riseup.net> wrote:
I'm not sure how you're evaluating his "investment," which was solving a number of previously-thought-unsolvable problems in applied cryptography in a way that became wildly popular, widely used, and enabled a large amount of very influential services.
Contributing to the world in such a manner rarely results in such wealth, but I don't see why it shouldn't.
Indeed. His invention is worth whatever value the market assigns it, and it's nobody's business to judge otherwise. -Bill