I'm on my phone. I'm not consenting to being away from my attempt to blockchain my emails regarding trying to find a brainwashing therapist. Sounds like I'll want to find one who's good with publishing the recordings, too. On Fri, Dec 25, 2020, 2:48 PM coderman <coderman@protonmail.com> wrote:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, December 25, 2020 7:19 PM, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 < punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
... did you sign one?
no, however i have asked for the SF-86's from the OPM hack to be publicly dumped - this
I'm not familiar with SF-86 or OPM. Do you mean that, even though you haven't agreed to anything, that after something you've done, how you communicate may have changed or could change? would allow for open source projects working on privacy enhancing
technologies to avoid potential conflicts of interest or subterfuge from contributors.
You're saying that if we supported your request (maybe by showing it is important and making that very public), it would basically protect from severe disruption in a way generalizeable to all open source efforts?
still waiting on that dump, of course :)
best regards,