On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:16:57 +0000 coderman <coderman@protonmail.com> wrote:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, January 12, 2021 7:49 AM, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote: ...
Yes, what's even more stunning is that this 'coderman' agent who tries to pose as 'anarchist' is also hysterically whining about 'treason'...to the US state. 'Anarchist' 'treason' the the 'anarchist' US state? Infinite self parody to the power of infinite.
i think what you and rat and zeenan are missing is that anarchism does not imply violence. period!
coderman, son, one of the most basic traits of 'anarchy' is being anti-state. your crass support for the fascist-biden-US-state and pretending to lecture 'us' on what 'anarchy' is, is simply insane...if taken at face value. In reality you are of course just a US military agent and what you post is what Karl should be calling 'disruption' (but interestingly enough he doesn't).
anarchism does not imply violence
That depends on the circumstances. There's nothing wrong with self-defense and beating the likes of you to a pulp.
rational anarchy is devoid of violent intent and capability,
enough, son. Go pretend that you're not a US military agent somewhere else.