On Dec 23, 2016, at 2:54 PM, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
All humans have basic human rights to privacy, freedom from arbitrary search and seizure, due process, torture, murder, etc... regardless of where they are, what citizenship they claim, or who is interested in them. Any govt that adopts anything less than the highest existing embodiment of such principles, wherever it is found in the world, should be laughed at for among other things, its own hyprocrisy. A specific targeted warrant should be required for all such things. With routine police work to both support and follow from that.
Put another way, it's not as if there wouldn't be such a single law, interpretation and applicability if a one world government gets its way. Except that by that time any rights may be an unrecognizably twisted relic of the past. Which is exactly what some of these interpretations and interpreters are trying to twist around jurisdictons and rationales with today.
This is simply a continuation of the society that we all were born into and most revel in (well, most in the 1st worlds…) Before the notion of a government, many of these ‘issues’ never arose. Murder and theft? Sure. Modern society, as we know it, gives zero fucks about the notion of a human right — As do many (most) of the humans involved. It’s already a foreign concept.