-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/28/2015 03:33 PM, nerv wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 11:55:02 -0700 Seth <list@sysfu.com> wrote:
[...]
Their website clearly states that the project is not secure and should not be used for "controversial" content however, so I'm not really sure how much abuse could happen, seems to me like someone with something to hide would have others and better options.
I would expect users whose "controversial" content is of a politically controversial nature would tend to drop this tool on learning of its potential failure modes, while those whose "controversial" activities are of a straight up criminal nature would be much less likely to learn about, or care about, those failure modes. The dirtier the deed, the more irrational hence compelling the motivation for it. :o/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVkG/rAAoJEDZ0Gg87KR0L5T0QAK/RUPWImvYVWqpDVgUXIouY g8PQ6aH8YYYBWvr76zmNjnmlNSXQOrGQyVaxSr5CbJatDRbjmVX4Dl5Jnt5qgiN/ BotsHRbKr0v7IncdEyMqiQY/mlfoRMbCjPIQr7IWP+tksndu8cEiOr3o17ozpLDC Z8V1ri637KgbiZaTdCAowy1XuHLamf/+YZXkV11uhEhHGMZ13DLfRJWOwLaqFo6a a1RnS7qseQAfe28x2lcffgZRKwWz3Y8j+RGtfBvTjMlyQVnUjarHL71dRluOqEJk 2QkjuyrH712s6IP1eUG+dsTIYIQSbo+G6f8tkiPSvTG5Toxt4oqId6lzMKVQhs9y a7G9Ksm+RJGcc/e0WBAq8nG5C0tkVUcvjaYfFpQgviTQY7USlW1d5A/aedFH0S2K 2Y8F39hxuLTmyezl7GO6DypfCv4dCUM821KWnhcsW7y54Teae07C+X20XEOrp5rM qxUnzD2mnFcKDB+vuJE3cbfyLwnj4rzLfx0TUElsusQ/2AG2J6BcJWLMJ+0LeW2n TPeaimKV44DPu9FdEpzjd5q39jox9XOsbwK28kxh6rRLpf8NP/4sytL/5t1Or2+a tUaNIoFvVMQNKj3LJEmjOnBjrOX4Kqcu5xm2HzBL7bWmwqWJjCxjWwAGtgebIK9y 4EZHRwPpQ56Xd0gj6Rvc =SEAB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----