On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:53:28 -0500 "\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward@gmail.com> wrote:
So, you can't be sure that a totalitarian state won't re-arise?
That is of course a posibility. So the options are, stick to technocratic theocratic tyranny, or overthrow it. The fact that government can be 're-created' is obviously not a pro-government argument. You're trying to argue against freedom because it allows people to do bad things?
Well, you see, I'm at a little bit of an impasse. What am I going to do in my anarchist paradise when such a threat to freedom arises?
defend yourself - but wait a second. Your first objection was idiotic. I pointed that out and you completely ignored it. And now you embarked on another idiotic non argument? " you can't be sure that a totalitarian state won't re-arise?" Nobody can, and so what. Can you be sure that you won't be run over by a car tomorrow? Better stay at home, forever.
I'm in the darkness here, help me see the light.
Why don't you and I duke it out and see whose philosophy is more powerful?
we've exchanged messages multiples times and I don't think you ever presented any philosophy...
I'm presenting one now. That without government, one finds out who's philosophy is best by "duking it out".
that's not a philosophy. That's just a false assertion which you're not even pretending to defend. What's next? Dictionary definition of anarchy is 'chaos'?
so go ahead, prove that your brand of jew-kristian lunacy is 'true' and that government(organized crime) is morally good. Prove that you have any authority to rule your neighbors.
Why use reason? Isn't reason a type of totalitarian control'?
No, reason is what shows that theocrats and statists like you don't have a leg to stand on. so go ahead, prove that your brand of jew-kristian lunacy is 'true' and that government(organized crime) is morally good. Prove that you have any authority to rule your neighbors. I am waiting.