Here is Cryptome's full set (so far) of post-admission replies. I'm unable to make anything consistent out of it."Admission of leaked logs" is rather generously overstated of what we specifically understated. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581186036989953Me: You understated things? As in, left something(s) out??Cryptome: Told what was needed to defuse your exaggeration and resist your demands to auth visitors. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652585088912355328Note that Cryptome doesn't dispute the email that I quoted, which was copy and pasted in it's entirety.Rigged and disinfo remain valid. You overstated the disclosure. Leaking is press exaggeration. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581918215684096Nothing is ever deleted, that is subterfuge to escape culpability. You ratted Cryptome visitors. Not the first or last. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652582251805474816*Note that Cryptome is definitely NOT using subterfuge to escape culpability or advising users of the data leak/breach/compromise/whatever spin word Cryptome wants to use.Still refusing to validate what you faked, rigged and released. And will not, it's your story, run with it. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652583921352355840Our claims remain valid despite the biased cherry-picking so beloved of childish argumentum ad hominem -- Cicero's bitch.On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:45 PM, coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:On 10/9/15, Michael Best <themikebest@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> Not sure how I was right AND the info is rigged and disinfo...
QUANTUMSQUIRREL casts suspicion, just like shade, too.