On 21.08.2013 00:45, rysiek wrote:
Yet they not only support SMTP and IMAP4, but they give instructions on how to set up Mozilla Thunderbird.
How gracious of them!
I feel you were being sarcastic. But it's not the case. Removing those help pages won't alienate their clients. It's truly a way to be nice. Also, although dropping SMTP and IMAP4 support and replacing them with some exotic closed protocol won't do a thing. Android update and the web interface would do the trick. It's even worse. When Yahoo has dropped POP3 support, without replacing it with anything, some Sourceforge projects were started just to replace that. So, again, it's truly a nice gesture. Maybe, only maybe, it helped them initially to gather up strenght. Today that means zero.
Ever heard of SPDY? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPDY
Yes. I heard of it. Thank you for including the wikipedia page. Have you read it?
OpenSSL 1.0.1 or greater introduces NPN.
The browsers Google Chrome/Chromium, Firefox (version 11+, enabled by default since 13) and Opera browser (version 12.10+) support SPDY.
Amazon's Silk browser for the Kindle Fire uses the SPDY protocol to communicate with their EC2 service for Web page rendering.
An open standard with quite large support from the open source community. Meaning many more can follow. So what's the point?
They use XMPP and they allow connections from outside their network.
Uhm... I'd be very careful with this one: http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/05/20/2315216/google-drops-xmpp-support http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/2013/05/hangouts-wont-hangout-with-other.html
I dislike slashdot. It's almost all noise. And one of the sites blocking Tor. But I was interested in your argument so I went there for the second time today. And there I read:
Note that no end date has been set for Talk
So, again, what is your point?
In most ways they are way ahead of the competition.
And most of these cases are a relic of a bygone era when Google actually practised what they preach, because they were the small, geeky underdog pitted against giants like Microsoft.
The pope preaches. Google sells. If I use Google search words start popping up suggesting me what I might ask. If I have gmail there is advertising related to the CONTENTS of my received emails. If I go around youtube I get a full column on the right hand side with suggestions. And you know what is impressive? They are all about right. And I surely have missed the time where someone officialy from Google went out and said «we're going to cripple all that for your privacy». Quite the opposite. They said it's one of the reasons people use Google instead of the competition. I personally like how you dramatise things. Yet, they were never small. Google has not started with Woz in a garage and it wasn't selling sports shoes out of a trunk. They had money. They had computing power. They had storage. Just because they have expanded over they years, does not mean they started as a image board on a Pentium hold behind a highschooler's desk.
Now they themselves are a giant and are slowly but steadily abandoning their open-source, open-standards ways in favour of walled-gardens, proprietary protocols and such.
You might have a case with the patents. But that is all. Actually the open standards, although good by being open, they are crap. Email is ugly and squirts information all along the path even if you do bother to encrypt everything. HTTP is chatty to the extreme. And so on. XMPP is nicer than OSCAR and PNG is better than GIF. That statement does not make telnet safer.
To me it sounds pretty much like the GNU/Linux kernel development: make your project popular enough and conform to our coding structure and we're going to include it in the main tree. Fail to do so and you are free to develop patches and loadable modules.
Where did *that* metaphore come from?..
From the kernel source.